Contraception, Contact and Covid – Not Necessarily in That Order

By Peter Dodd

Partner

The government has announced that 12 to 16 year olds can be protected by extending rolling out the vaccination program. In the absence of parental consent this group of children can make their own choice if they are classed as being, what is known as ‘Gillick competent’. What does this mean?

This was, and is relevant to family law and how judges make decisions. A simple example. Mum says that their children should not see their other parent as the children say they do not want to see the absent parent. A court appointed professional, will ascertain a child’s wishes. If they are of sufficient maturity and understanding, then that child’s view will be given great weight compared to a much younger and immature child. In the latter case the court professional is more likely to give a recommendation to the court, having made more enquiries of both parents and taking all the circumstances of the case into account (with a child’s opinion carrying less weight).

The Health Secretary’s view is that the number of cases where children disagree with their parents will be on the low side. But for that group now you know what principles will be applied by the health professional before a decision is made ‘to jab or not to jab’.

For more information and to find out how we can help you, please contact us on 0345 646 0406 or fill in our online enquiry form and a member of our Team will be in touch.